UNDERSTANDING CLAIMS MADE VS
OCCURRENCE FORM LIABILITY
|Assume for a moment that a Summons and
Complaint arrives at your office. After an unpleasant exchange with the
process server, you close your office door, shut off your phone, and begin
reading through the numerous allegations. As you plow through the legal
jargon, you find you are being sued for alleged negligence that occurred as
part of services rendered more than 5 years ago. You remember the
difficulties you and your staff encountered dealing with this client and
completing your assignment.
You need to report the claim. However, you’ve switched insurers four times in the past five years, and achieved dramatic reductions in your premium costs. Which of the four companies will respond to defend and settle this claim? What factors determine insurance coverage in a situation where a claim is made many years after the project is completed? Were you careful to preserve coverage for prior acts each time you changed insurers? Who can you turn to for help to untangle this mess?
Claims-Made or Occurrence Form?
Two widely differing approaches are used by insurers to determine coverage when writing liability insurance. The difference centers upon the event that triggers coverage, and is known as the “coverage trigger.” The two approaches are known as “claims-made and reported” (“claims made”) and “occurrence.” A review of your present liability insurance program will reveal both claims made and occurrence policy forms as part of your risk management program. For example, your business package policy may include commercial general liability insurance written on an occurrence basis. Your employee benefits liability, professional liability and employment practices liability insurance will use the claims-made coverage trigger.
The differences between claims-made and occurrence forms
The occurrence policy’s coverage trigger is tied to the date of the event or accident giving rise to the claim. Under an occurrence contract, the policy in force on the date of the event causing the loss must respond with both defense and indemnity. The claim may arise years after the policy has expired, and the occurrence coverage trigger places little or no importance on the date the insured receives notice of the claim. In the case of a claims-made policy, however, determination of coverage is triggered by the date you first became aware and notify the insurer of a claim or potential claim. The insurer’s policy in force on the date you became aware and give notice is the insurer who must defend and settle the claim.
In the case of a claims-made policy, however, determination of coverage is triggered by the date you first became aware and notify the insurer of a claim or potential claim. The insurer’s policy in force on the date you became aware and give notice is the insurer who must defend and settle the claim.
Prior acts coverage
Occurrence policies do not provide coverage for prior acts. They do remain available for claims that arise years after they have expired. If an accident or event occurs during the term of an occurrence policy, that policy must respond to any future claim. A claims-made policy may reach backwards in time and provide coverage for claims made today from negligent acts, errors or omissions that occurred years before the policy was purchased. As outlined later, several conditions must be met before prior acts coverage is granted.
Advantages to the insurance company
Claims-made insurance allows for a close match between premium dollars and claims. Shortly after the expiration of a claims-made policy, an insurer can close its books and determine its profit or loss. Under an occurrence policy, an insurer cannot determine its profit or loss for decades because of possible incurred but not reported claims.
Disadvantages of claims made insurance
The primary disadvantage of claims-made insurance is its complexity. This presents challenges for the insurance professionals writing these policies, and makes the purchase of proper coverage difficult for the consumer. A second disadvantage is the necessity of following precisely the notification procedures for claims and potential claims situations.
Because coverage is triggered by your awareness and notification of a claim or potential claim situation, failure to properly provide notification to the insurer will eliminate coverage. The following examples show how this can be a problem.
Assume a professional changes professional liability insurance carriers and fails to notify the expiring carrier of his knowledge of a potential claim situation. Should the matter later develop into a lawsuit, both the old and new insurer will deny coverage based upon a breach of the notification requirements. Changing from one claims-made policy to another can be accomplished without gaps, but it requires careful compliance with each policy’s reporting provisions.
a professional retires from practice and simply does not renew his
claims-made policy. All coverage for prior services ceases once a
claims made policy is allowed to expire. A special endorsement known
as an "Extended Reporting Period", "tail" or "run-off" can be used to solve
this problem but not without cost.
The insured must make a “good faith”
statement (in some cases, a certification or warranty) that the professional
and the firm had no knowledge of the mistake, error or controversy on the
date coverage was purchased.
A Key Component of the Allen Financial Difference
[ Home | Allen Financial | Equestrian Group | Am Equestrian | Am Recreation | Site Map ]
|Phoenix, AZ - Home Office
|Del Mar, CA
|Mailing Address: 12424 N. 32nd Street #101 Phoenix, AZ 85032
|General Information: firstname.lastname@example.org
|Customer Service: email@example.com
|Allen Financial Insurance Group © Copyright 2007, 2016